Text

To people visiting my site and ‘liking’ my posts

If you are not a spammer, please continue as you were.

If you are a spammer, and/or are attempting to exploit this community by ‘liking’ peoples’ posts in a hope that they will click on your link, and go to your tumblr site which has been loaded with scripts which redirect them to porn and repeatedly refresh the location to more porn and ads and popups:


I hope you catch a disease or are subject to afflictions and conditions which don’t kill you, but will make your life uncomfortable and unpleasant due to any or all of the following:

  • Warts - Either on exposed parts of your body or bottom so that it makes it unpleasant to sit.
  • Boils and pustules - As above. If they weep either visibly or enough so that wet spots appear on your clothing and then dry so that your clothes stick to the boil so when you pull the fabric away it also rips the top of the boil off again, all the better.
  • Acid reflux
  • Papercuts - On the knuckles of your hands or feet
  • Mosquito bites - As above
  • Food allergies - The ones which cause the back of your throat to itch where you can’t scratch and all you can do is continue to swallow repeatedly or make that air biting face dogs make when they’ve tasted something unpleasant, in the vain hope that the motion will alleviate some of the irritation.
  • Pimples - Just on the inside of your ears or nose
  • Tooth sensitivity to hot and cold that Sensodyne and other similar toothpastes and mouthwashes won’t be able to assist with
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome - Not because you’re a physical wanker, but because you’re a true wanker at heart for drawing traffic to your site in this ultimately tosser way

I also hope that every cat you see hisses at you, dogs bark and snarl at you as you pass, and that rodents will sneak into your home and take a whizz and dump on your pillow.

Loading...

Photo
My cousin posted on facebook a request for us to vote for her family in this family portrait competition.
In this screenshot are the other three families (I would have included hers as well but my browser couldn’t fit all four in at the same time for me to screenshot).  Please click through from the link above to see all four and tell me if you see something amiss.  You might even be able to tell what is amiss from the screenshot itself.
The competition is called the “IMAGE Families Competition”.  IMAGE because that is the name of the company, and based on the name, the competition theme is families.  I don’t know about you, but I don’t see ‘families’ in the portraits of the other contestants on that page.
I made mention of this on my cousin’s post thread and was informed by one of her friends, “I think you’ll find that “families” come in all shapes and sizes… not just husband, wife and children.”.
Firstly, I find it laughable that the response was assuming that I potentially had a problem with a gay family, or that possibly, I had a problem with the other contestants not having children.  It might be PMS speaking, but this struck me as such a righteous, high-horse type response. I’m so glad you’re such a liberal and open-minded person who feels strongly enough to try to defend gender, sexual or marriage equality. I certainly feel put in my place now for thinking that these other contestants couldn’t be considered families, how conservative of me to think this way in modern society[1][2].
When I first saw these photos, this certainly was not the first thing that crossed my mind.  The lack of children admittedly did cross my mind, but it certainly wasn’t the first thing that occurred to me.  Although now that you mention it (from Dictionary.com):
fam·i·ly [fam-uh-lee, fam-lee] plural -liesnoun 1a. a basic social unit consisting of parents and their children, considered as a group, whether dwelling together or not: the traditional family. 1b. a social unit consisting of one or more adults together with the children they care for: a single-parent family. 2. the children of one person or one couple collectively: We want a large family. 3. the spouse and children of one person: We’re taking the family on vacation next week. 4. any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents, children, uncles, aunts, and cousins: to marry into a socially prominent family. 5. all those persons considered as descendants of a common progenitor.
Those definitions tend to suggest children forming part of the family unit.  Don’t really need to go into that bit much further.
What I am taking issue with, in case you haven’t noticed it already, is that while some of those photos are lovely examples of general portraiture with aesthetic value, good use of light and shadow, interesting focus and emotive elements, blah blah blah, they don’t strike me as thematically appropriate photos for a family theme.
Most obvious one, the Elsing family: I’m quite certain these are not found in your usual family album.  They’re in their underwear.  One of them is a rather seductive pose where one family member is straddled on top of the other one.
The Nimmo and Walter family also appear to have topless shots or shots of them in their underwear.  In one of the Nimmo’s, it looks like there’s a hand cupping a boob.
I think I’m far from a prude about these sorts of photos and again, as portraits, some of these are quite lovely.  For example, the second Nimmo one is adorable and I think the individual Walter portraits are quite striking.  Even the last Elsing one is quite lovely even though the style and post makes me think of “The Kiss”.  In fact, the only one I don’t really like is the Nimmo muscle shot.
I just don’t think that they’re really family photos and I think the photography studio is remiss in using them for this theme.  Call it a regular portrait competition, but don’t try to label it a family one.  The photos aren’t exactly family friendly, and when I was sending the link to friends, I had to include a NSFW tag out of courtesy.  There are few if any circumstances I can think of when something family should also be labelled NSFW.
Returning to my cousin’s friend’s comment, I suppose if you think that (partially or wholly) naked and/or in the midst of seduction is one of the shapes and sizes of a family and that those photos are perfectly acceptable to put in a photo album between Little Johnny’s first steps and Grandma’s 80th birthday then okay, I concede that perhaps I am a little too traditional and most definitely not progressive enough for modern society.
Anyway, I voted for my cousin’s family in this competition, not just because they’re part of my family (as defined by dictionary definition 4 and 5) but also for the principle of the thing. I requested that I be omitted from the prize draw though because I don’t really want anything to do with a photog who thinks family portraits include seductive photos or nakey/lingerie.

[1] I had thought about this a while to figure out if I misinterpreted the comment. But I’m not sure what else she could have been alluding to. So if she was referring to something else entirely and I jumped to the invalid conclusion that she was referring to the sexual preference or lack of child preference of the couples, then perhaps I’m the overly righteous and defensive one. In which case, let’s blame PMS for this rant.
[2] *snark*

My cousin posted on facebook a request for us to vote for her family in this family portrait competition.

In this screenshot are the other three families (I would have included hers as well but my browser couldn’t fit all four in at the same time for me to screenshot).  Please click through from the link above to see all four and tell me if you see something amiss.  You might even be able to tell what is amiss from the screenshot itself.

The competition is called the “IMAGE Families Competition”.  IMAGE because that is the name of the company, and based on the name, the competition theme is families.  I don’t know about you, but I don’t see ‘families’ in the portraits of the other contestants on that page.

I made mention of this on my cousin’s post thread and was informed by one of her friends, “I think you’ll find that “families” come in all shapes and sizes… not just husband, wife and children.”.

Firstly, I find it laughable that the response was assuming that I potentially had a problem with a gay family, or that possibly, I had a problem with the other contestants not having children.  It might be PMS speaking, but this struck me as such a righteous, high-horse type response. I’m so glad you’re such a liberal and open-minded person who feels strongly enough to try to defend gender, sexual or marriage equality. I certainly feel put in my place now for thinking that these other contestants couldn’t be considered families, how conservative of me to think this way in modern society[1][2].

When I first saw these photos, this certainly was not the first thing that crossed my mind.  The lack of children admittedly did cross my mind, but it certainly wasn’t the first thing that occurred to me.  Although now that you mention it (from Dictionary.com):

fam·i·ly [fam-uh-lee, fam-lee] plural -lies
noun
1a. a basic social unit consisting of parents and their children, considered as a group, whether dwelling together or not: the traditional family.
1b. a social unit consisting of one or more adults together with the children they care for: a single-parent family.
2. the children of one person or one couple collectively: We want a large family.
3. the spouse and children of one person: We’re taking the family on vacation next week.
4. any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents, children, uncles, aunts, and cousins: to marry into a socially prominent family.
5. all those persons considered as descendants of a common progenitor.

Those definitions tend to suggest children forming part of the family unit.  Don’t really need to go into that bit much further.

What I am taking issue with, in case you haven’t noticed it already, is that while some of those photos are lovely examples of general portraiture with aesthetic value, good use of light and shadow, interesting focus and emotive elements, blah blah blah, they don’t strike me as thematically appropriate photos for a family theme.

Most obvious one, the Elsing family: I’m quite certain these are not found in your usual family album.  They’re in their underwear.  One of them is a rather seductive pose where one family member is straddled on top of the other one.

The Nimmo and Walter family also appear to have topless shots or shots of them in their underwear.  In one of the Nimmo’s, it looks like there’s a hand cupping a boob.

I think I’m far from a prude about these sorts of photos and again, as portraits, some of these are quite lovely.  For example, the second Nimmo one is adorable and I think the individual Walter portraits are quite striking.  Even the last Elsing one is quite lovely even though the style and post makes me think of “The Kiss”.  In fact, the only one I don’t really like is the Nimmo muscle shot.

I just don’t think that they’re really family photos and I think the photography studio is remiss in using them for this theme.  Call it a regular portrait competition, but don’t try to label it a family one.  The photos aren’t exactly family friendly, and when I was sending the link to friends, I had to include a NSFW tag out of courtesy.  There are few if any circumstances I can think of when something family should also be labelled NSFW.

Returning to my cousin’s friend’s comment, I suppose if you think that (partially or wholly) naked and/or in the midst of seduction is one of the shapes and sizes of a family and that those photos are perfectly acceptable to put in a photo album between Little Johnny’s first steps and Grandma’s 80th birthday then okay, I concede that perhaps I am a little too traditional and most definitely not progressive enough for modern society.

Anyway, I voted for my cousin’s family in this competition, not just because they’re part of my family (as defined by dictionary definition 4 and 5) but also for the principle of the thing. I requested that I be omitted from the prize draw though because I don’t really want anything to do with a photog who thinks family portraits include seductive photos or nakey/lingerie.


[1] I had thought about this a while to figure out if I misinterpreted the comment. But I’m not sure what else she could have been alluding to. So if she was referring to something else entirely and I jumped to the invalid conclusion that she was referring to the sexual preference or lack of child preference of the couples, then perhaps I’m the overly righteous and defensive one. In which case, let’s blame PMS for this rant.

[2] *snark*

Loading...

Text

Vodafone… again

I hate to break my relative drought of posts with a whinge, but circumstances make this unavoidable.

Vodafone enticed me back to them by offering to waive the remaining 3-4 months of my contract, and giving me an iPhone 4 32G for what works out to be $2 less than what I was paying before.  And this is Vodafone direct and not the third party reseller who kept robot pranking my phone to get me to renew my contract. Even after I told them to remove my number from their call list.

I was expecting the coverage and product service to be about the same as with 3, but I was pleasantly surprised by improved speed 3G and slightly better reception.

That’s until I had to deal with customer service again.

The reason I had to contact customer service is because at around 7 in the morning, I keep getting these ‘helpful’ texts giving me advice on how to make use of the Vodafone services.  I couldn’t give a rodent’s derriere that I get free facebook and twitter, or that I can stream sporting coverage or what have you.  I mean it’s nice that they do this, but they set my phone off before my alarm starts binging.  That’s just not on. If a service provider is calling or messaging me before 9am in my timezone, it should be because something of importance to me is on fire, or because I asked them to (like hotel wake-up calls).

As a mobile phone user, my needs are simple.  I use my mobile phone for calls and 3G.  Aside from this, the only other expectation I have is that the device is not carrier locked so I can use it when I travel out of the country.  Also, the first thing I do with a new carrier is to disable voicemail, roaming and anything that doesn’t involve giving me internet access or the ability to make calls.

So I tweeted the Vodafone support account:

Me: How do I opt out of the ‘helpful’ SMSs? I am only interested in the bill notifications.
Vodafone: To opt out of the Helpful TXTs, please see MyVodafone for My messaging and then select Subscribe to TXT updates.

I log into My Vodafone and look for something on the page called My Messaging.  I see a box with that heading and two links:

  • Send a TXT online
  • Horoscopes, Lovescopes, News, Sport, Weather, & more delivered straight to your mobile

The closest thing was the second link.  So I clicked on that.  It asks me to log in again. Okay. Log in again. Fail.  It won’t accept my log-in credentials.

I message them this problem, but in the mean time I realise they mean a menu option called My Messaging which appears if you hover over My Vodafone in the main navigation. The directions could have been more clear.

I click on it and get a HTTP 502 Bad Gateway. This is a server error. Not browser related.

Me: Found My Messaging under the My Vodafone menu (the instruction wasn’t clear, sorry). Now I get the error Bad Gateway.
Vodafone: Are you getting the error before or after selecting ‘My Messaging’ ?
Me: After I click on My Messaging.
Vodafone: Are you accessing MyVodafone from a PC or your phone?
Me: PC
Vodafone: What type of phone do you have? Are you able to try through your phone?
Me: Bad Gateway is a server error and not browser or device specific. Tried it anyway. But the interface is different for mobile and there is no My Messaging menu option.
Vodafone: What phone model do you have? There is another way to unsubscribe.
Me: iPhone
Vodafone: How long have you been using it for? Did you previously have a nokia?

Why is this relevant? At all?

Firstly, the last time I was with Vodafone I had the Nokia N95 and that was about two years ago.  I don’t recall tweeting them which is the only identification they have for me.  The last contact I had with ‘them’ was to the 3 support twitter when I had the iPhone 3GS.  So if they’re trying to guess my account identity solely by my twitter handle, then they’re either going on really old information, or they’re not reading my contact history when I spoke with 3, and that’s if those two tracking systems are integrated.

Secondly, seriously. What has which phone I have got to do with the price of fish on Tuesday, or more specifically, their server returning a 502 when all I want is to opt out of the helpful wake-up texts?

I should just disable my mobile service and just use wifi. Y’all can just Skype me when I’m within range of a wifi network.

    Loading...

    Text

    Stop making the photo small!

    Aaaaaa!

    I can’t believe how hard it is to get this to let you see the full size pano.  Uploading it to tumblr made it link through to a small ‘hi-res’ version.  Linking to flickr you can’t access the original size.  So I’ve had to force hard link it to the static url to the original.

    Grrr…

    So now you can click through to make the pano bigger. YAY.

    Loading...

    Photo
    suitep:

Yes I’m watching it. In a rerun.  I love seeing how tickled they are with each other. I love seeing Princess Diana’s shy smile peeping out of William. That kills me a little bit because I loved her.  Like most people, I remember where I was when I heard she’d died.
I love the pageantry and the sense of centuries of history you can feel. I love it that everyone is cheering and singing.
And I love seeing that there’s joy in the world. Just when you think everything’s gone to hell, it’s good to be reminded it doesn’t always feel that way.

This is exactly why I think this whole thing has been lovely.  Poo-poo to all the haters.
And poo-poo to those people who have gone “Oh, I’m so disappointed because her dress isn’t original” “It’s such a rip off of Grace Kelly”. How dare she wear a dress that she likes to her own wedding. She should have been thinking of what the rest of the ‘fashionistas’ would think when she chose that Grace Kelly inspired number for the day that would be more important to her than anyone else in the world. What is this I don’t even[1].
As I’ve tweeted, it’s not that I’m a royalist, nor am I one of those people who have had their wedding planned since age three[2].  It’s that weddings are (generally) happy and warm fuzzy things.
And while the level of media coverage does mean papers and television have been in your face about it for weeks, considering the year the planet has had so far, I think it’s a nice deviation before we return to the seemingly endless torrent (no pun intended) of natural disasters.
If I was at home during the wedding, I’d also have organised a Royal Wedding Tea Party. Pretty much because I’ll take any excuse to have High Tea[3].
So, go Kate and Wills. May you live happily ever after! And stuff. *tea toast with extended pinky*

[1] I don’t quite get this expression, but it seems appropriate.
[2] There are other things I could be mooning over, like I dunno… food… shinies…
[3] It’s a day of the week that ends in ‘day’[4]: Tea Party!
[4] Royal Weddingday!

    suitep:

    Yes I’m watching it. In a rerun. I love seeing how tickled they are with each other. I love seeing Princess Diana’s shy smile peeping out of William. That kills me a little bit because I loved her. Like most people, I remember where I was when I heard she’d died.

    I love the pageantry and the sense of centuries of history you can feel. I love it that everyone is cheering and singing.

    And I love seeing that there’s joy in the world. Just when you think everything’s gone to hell, it’s good to be reminded it doesn’t always feel that way.

    This is exactly why I think this whole thing has been lovely.  Poo-poo to all the haters.

    And poo-poo to those people who have gone “Oh, I’m so disappointed because her dress isn’t original” “It’s such a rip off of Grace Kelly”. How dare she wear a dress that she likes to her own wedding. She should have been thinking of what the rest of the ‘fashionistas’ would think when she chose that Grace Kelly inspired number for the day that would be more important to her than anyone else in the world. What is this I don’t even[1].

    As I’ve tweeted, it’s not that I’m a royalist, nor am I one of those people who have had their wedding planned since age three[2].  It’s that weddings are (generally) happy and warm fuzzy things.

    And while the level of media coverage does mean papers and television have been in your face about it for weeks, considering the year the planet has had so far, I think it’s a nice deviation before we return to the seemingly endless torrent (no pun intended) of natural disasters.

    If I was at home during the wedding, I’d also have organised a Royal Wedding Tea Party. Pretty much because I’ll take any excuse to have High Tea[3].

    So, go Kate and Wills. May you live happily ever after! And stuff. *tea toast with extended pinky*


    [1] I don’t quite get this expression, but it seems appropriate.

    [2] There are other things I could be mooning over, like I dunno… food… shinies…

    [3] It’s a day of the week that ends in ‘day’[4]: Tea Party!

    [4] Royal Weddingday!

    Loading...

    Photo
    {089} of 365.
The Hush Puppies I bought in Jakarta.  Why don’t they have cute styles like this in Australia? I simply do not understand why all the practical and comfortable shoes they sell in Australia have to be horrible granny shoes. And even then, I’m sure there are grannies who wish they didn’t have to wear granny shoes.Oh, and my podiatrist loves them. That’s how awesome they are.
Addendum: Odd rubbing issues at the heel resolved by nice squishy sticky-in things. Shoes still pretty awesome.

    {089} of 365.

    The Hush Puppies I bought in Jakarta.  Why don’t they have cute styles like this in Australia? I simply do not understand why all the practical and comfortable shoes they sell in Australia have to be horrible granny shoes. And even then, I’m sure there are grannies who wish they didn’t have to wear granny shoes.

    Oh, and my podiatrist loves them. That’s how awesome they are.

    Addendum: Odd rubbing issues at the heel resolved by nice squishy sticky-in things. Shoes still pretty awesome.

    Loading...

    Text

    OH in Subiaco - Why the world is going down the crapper

    I was wandering around Subiaco today, killing time after a meeting before I had to head off to dinner with friends, when I overhead a conversation between a shop-keeper and a customer.

    They were discussing their daughters and the difficulties they had trying to decide which private school to send their girls.  One has a year 11 girl at MLC and said that when she and her husband were scouting schools they had considered St Hilda’s and PLC but they got the best vibe from the principal of MLC and the general feel of the school and students/parents they had met.

    The shop-keeper had expressed her concerns in deciding on a school as well, but had ended up choosing to send her 10 year old to MLC for the same reasons as her customer “despite the rocky reputation of MLC over the last few years.”  And MLC seemed to have a nice distribution of kids from different backgrounds and didn’t appear to have the cliques the other schools had.  Gods willing the year group her daughter enters into isn’t filled with little ass-hats (their sentiment in my words).

    They started talking about the other schools like PLC and St Hilda’s, and said that St Hilda’s seemed to have a terrible reputation of girls with anorexia problems. Not surprising, St Hilda’s seems to breed them tall and skinny with a penchant for wanting to get into modelling.

    One of them had learned that a number of the year 12 girls at a couple of the schools had breast enhancements. She heard from some other parents that the parents at these schools were inclined to bribe their children with nose and boob jobs in exchange for academic performance.

    Say what?

    So, we used to call the PLC girls “Prostitute’s Last Chance” but who thought they were that keen on ‘developing their assets’ for that career. Seriously, at that age kids haven’t finished growing yet.

    What kind of parent uses plastic surgery as an incentive to get their kids to do better in school?  My first guess is it’s the new money types and cashed up bogans who are earning a packet working in the mining and resources industry in the state.  But wow, way to raise your kid with good values and healthy body image attitudes.

    And this is why I am disinclined to send my future kids to private school. At least in this state.  I’ve been through the private school system here, and it’s full of manipulation, intrigue and one-upmanship.  You’d think all of that is character building, but I think there is such a thing as too much character…

    Loading...

    Text

    Mind Boggling Common Sense

    Reading a post ‘tip’ about how to wash a lot of greens.  The tip is to fill your sink and swish the greens in the water and let the sand and grit settle.  I’m with one of the commenters who said “You mean most people don’t wash their greens this way?”.  But this isn’t the boggling thing.

    The boggling thing is another commenter who thinks their sink is too filthy to wash their greens in and asked for tips on how to wash their sink.

    You wash your dishes, cutlery, glassware, pots, pans, knives, cutting boards and other utensils in your sink.  Most of these things you eat off of, or have direct contact with your mouth at some point.  Some of these things you prepare raw food on.  For the things that need to be heated to cook your food, sure heat kills germs, but heat does not kill mank.

    So seriously, if your sink is too filthy to wash greens in, how can you bring yourself to do anything food related with what you wash in it?  Or if you think the things you wash in it are safe, then wash the sink the way you wash your dishes?

    This is like the thing where people think eating offal is manky, but happily eat eggs[1].


    [1] This link is safe for work, but if you like eggs but are squeamish and may get turned off eggs by a technical definition for what eggs actually are (if you have never thought about it before), then don’t click on this link.

    Loading...

    Text

    Ye of Little Faith

    Last month we had an extended family dinner for a cousin who had just announced his engagement.  The ‘grown-ups’ sat at one table and all the cousins (and their partners) sat at the other.  One of the other cousins who usually sits at the grown-up table (delusions of maturity) decided to join us that night, for reasons beyond my comprehension.

    He’s quite a character this cousin, whom I will refer to as Cadbury from here on, but I don’t think he even needs the full glass and a half before he’s well and truly past tipsy.  The entire evening he was trying to give us life advice.  How to cook, how to enrich our lives, how to ‘shine’… The cousins don’t usually say much in response to things like this because we were raised to be quiet (and polite, but sometimes that’s the same thing).  So he kept going on.. and on… and ohgodspleasemakehimstop.

    Some choice pearls of wisdom that he was so gracious to impart upon us:

    “To cook well is to use fresh ingredients. So the trick to doing this is to only buy what you need.” - No. Shit. Sherlock.

    “My parents, unlike myself, are flawed. They don’t understand what is important in life.  I do, that’s why I shine.” - Oh really, I thought that rosy glow was the result of the alcohol you have imbibed this evening.

    A lot of his advice was only served once he had decided he had accused you enough of not being as wonderful as he was.  He interrogated engaged cousin and his fiancée (CF) about the last time they cooked.  They don’t cook very much and he found this somewhat offensive and began to lecture about quality of life.

    He told another two cousins that they look like they have the potential to shine, but they have to love themselves first (or something) and that he doesn’t have that problem at all (obviously).

    There was also a lot of “When you get to my age…” the problem is, there’s only ten years between the eldest and the youngest cousin.  And he was wearing my patience sorely thin.  After the nth “When you get to my age” I had to interject with “And how old are you, grandfather?”.

    Cadbury dominated the table conversation all evening but things came to a head when he asked CF what she would do if she had only 24 hours left to live (part of the ‘Quality of Life’ lecture).  She replied that she would be at church praying.

    He replied “Oh, so you’re Christian?” and she said “Yes.”  Cadbury tried to determine how ‘Christianly’ she actually was by asking her when was the last time she went to church.  She replied “Last Sunday” and he expressed complete surprise because he had expected her faith to be one of convenience.

    Cadbury started asking about whether she believes in the gift of eternal life (she said ‘yes’) and tried to establish the strength of her belief.  He said “If God manifested himself in front of you right now, and said that there is no such thing as eternal life, would you still believe in God?”

    CF said “Yes.”

    Cadbury replied “LIAR!”

    I thought “Oh no you didn’t.”

    He said “You would believe in God, even if he told you no such thing as eternal life?”

    “Yes”

    “I don’t believe you.  If God manifested himself in front of me and told me I would have eternal life if I believed in him, I would and I would do everything in my power to achieve it.”

    He also said things about how he isn’t Christian because he believes in the strength of his own skills and ability to do or get whatever he wants or needs.  And he expressed his disbelief that people would believe in God even if the promise of the reward of eternal life didn’t exist.

    It was around this time that I snapped.

    I may not be religious, and I don’t like people forcing their faith upon me, but I acknowledge and respect that people have their beliefs.  I also read about said beliefs because it’s what I do, I read.  And whether it was Christianity, Islam or a potato, if someone says they believe in something, who are you to tell them they’re a liar just because you don’t believe yourself?

    Not to mention this is their freaking engagement party and you’re antagonising the people whose party this is for to satisfy your arrogance and narrow-mindedness.

    I also don’t appreciate people treating faith like a reward point system.  You’re not collecting fucking Frequent Flyer miles that you can trade in for points+pay for your very own Eternal Life from the bloody catalogue.

    In all fairness, there are people who are actually like that, and I am being a hypocrite with respect to those people for judging them on how they choose to demonstrate their faith.  But how shallow would you have to be to treat the holy text of your faith, the entity you believe to be a Higher Power, for some their raison d’être, the way you treat discount coupons or stamps on a loyalty card?  It just seems so cheap.

    I said most of this at the cousin table, and directed it mainly at Cadbury, although without the swearing.  Never have I been so vocal at a family gathering.  And never have I felt as much anger towards any of my extended family as I did that night.

    Besides that, what is the definition of eternal life anyway? All faiths have some interpretation of it.  And it’s up to the person who believes to know how they feel about it and what they think it is or means.

    Another cousin asked, “If all faiths have eternal life then what makes Christianity different? Why would someone choose it over another faith?”.  This question made me think of when we were asked to upsell products when I was working call centre… It was a very peculiar feeling.

    I ended up having to try to explain what I believed (hah) I understood of eternal life and defending faith.  Most of you have no idea what a strange position this was for me.  You know, the one whose relatives have called her a pagan or Godless heathen amongst other colourful and more interesting names.

    It’s obvious that eternal life in the Christian definition isn’t physical immortality.  Immortality of the soul or spirit? Perhaps.  It could also be eternal life through reincarnation, becoming one with The Powers That Be, with the universe or your higher spiritual self.  It could be any number of things depending on who you are, where you feel you sit in the Grand Design, cosmic scheme of things or whatever it is you feel most strongly about, or what gives you the most comfort to know or believe.

    That might have been a faffy explanation, but there’s just so much that it could be depending on who you are and how you look at it.  I couldn’t possibly articulate how big the question they asked was to them.  It is not family dinner conversation at all. Not in the slightest.

    And at the end of my stint on the soap box, at least two of the cousins asked me if I was Christian. I wanted to ask why in the hell do I have to be Christian to read and want to learn more about different beliefs and spirituality?

    But that was, and is another rant for another time.

    Loading...

    Text

    Flowchart This

    Now and then (okay, all the time) when I have to do tech support for the parental unit, particularly when I have to do it over the phone or email, I wish I could make her fill out a flow chart of things so that I can work out what exactly the problem is. Otherwise what usually happens is something along the lines of:

    “A window came up and says stuff but I didn’t know what that meant so I closed it. But now I can’t figure out how to get it back.”

    “This thing keeps coming up and telling me to install it otherwise I’ll get viruses, should I do it?”[1]

    “The lights are flashing but it isn’t coming on.  How do I make it work?”

    But I would probably be crucified if I tried to make mum lodge a bug or follow a flow-chart for troubleshooting, even though it’d make my life a hell of a lot easier[2].

    And from time to time I get the idea in my head that I’ll do it.  I’ll create a flow-chart and a manual with screenshots and everything and nice little annotations just like when I used to maintain the support pages for a certain ISP.

    But then I realise that I would have to make sure she’ll read it. And use it, even though in her mind the easiest solution is to bug me.  It’s what has happened before with written instructions for things like “How to attach files to an email”.  I swear she has six copies of the same instructions and she has lost each one of them. And they were in notebooks.  Once the instructions were right in front of her and she still called me over because it was just easier.

    It also occurs to me that if I managed to create this all-purpose troubleshooting guide for parental units I could make millions selling it to other people like me and parents of other people like me.  But then I also realise that the blood, sweat and tears to beta test such a solution is never going to be worth the financial gain.

    So here I am, trying to figure out the hard way which bloody window for which godforsaken application it is that she lost and can’t get back.


    [1] This one is always a worry, especially since Windows started doing lightboxing for errors and that means every dodgy site on the Internet has installed the lightbox javascript library to get people to install malware… Oh and the answer is always ‘No’.

    [2] It doesn’t help that the work she does means that people install crap on her laptop and DISABLE THE ANTIVIRUS AND FIREWALL because their guys don’t know how to set access perms for the application in Norton so it doesn’t defecate itself every time she runs it.  And even if you do add perms, any time the application does anything remotely peculiar, their first strategy is to disable Norton.[3]

    [3] The easiest solution at this point would have been to walk into said application’s office with a sawn-off shotgun. But that would have been messy, so I installed a different anti-virus and firewall suite instead.

    Loading...

    Stuff I like