Link

disoriented:

Felicia Day on the VF article.

Here are the links to the other articles responding to VF:

CNETGeek WeekMediaite.com, Geek Girl Diva

It’s funny, when I was writing my response, I was thinking Mean Girls too, just like CNET.

Loading...

Photo
America’s Tweethearts | vanityfair.com (via disoriented)
I just read this and I can’t help but feel how condescending the VF article was.  Sure the only person I know of in it is Felicia Day, but some things from the article made me wonder what the writer actually thought of the people they were calling tweethearts.
The writer referred to them constantly as ‘girls’, when they’re aged 26 to 30 and they work for a living.  How old are you, grandmother who penned the article? 36.
On Twitter, she wrote it “doesn’t even require real sentences, only a continual patter of excessively declarative and abbreviated palaver.”. While this is true, “doesn’t even” paints some definite bias towards how one should feel about the people she is writing about[1].  On the people she describes as tweethearts, “It so happens that they are nice girls—the Internet’s equivalent of a telephone chat line staffed by a bunch of cheerleaders”[2].  Is that all they are, ‘nice cheerleaders’?
What about talking about their achievements, or what actually makes these people popular or tweethearts other than their multitudes of followers? Popularity just doesn’t spring out of thin air.
The author writes, “the act of text-messaging the world [snip] is the essential feat of a twilebrity”. Well.. no. There are a couple factors that make a ‘twilebrity’.  Being able to text message isn’t actually one of them, it’s just a medium.  I mean check out @ActuallyNPH’s starting tweets.  They technically didn’t fit within the 140 character mark, but his ability to get his meaning and sense of humour across despite his truncated messages suggests some level of communicative skill, not simply an ability to text message.
Aside from prior celebrity, content is what keeps people coming back, not just the ability to jam 140 characters or less into some semblance of a message.  Not the “droppings” the writer mentions such as “getting highlights before class,” “I hrd u had fun!,” “Wah, missing my twittr time!”.  If that is all these people are tweeting, I’m not entirely sure how they managed to get and keep their several hundred thousand to 1.6 million followers.
I don’t care how much of a fan I am of their work, if that is all someone was tweeting… well, there’s only so much faecal tweet matter one can handle.  And most of us get more than enough spam a day without inflicting ourselves with more inane day-to-day messages from people we don’t know personally.
Or perhaps I missed that the point of the article was only about critiquing twitter as a new media source and its relation to real-time web (oh and how many articles have we seen about that already) rather than about the tweethearts the article title suggests it is about.

[1] And I am suddenly reminded of the way the outcast describes or perceives the in-crowd in those teen movies. Just as an aside.
[2] A bunch of pretty girls who call out short and witty messages with no real depth to improve morale.  Well that clears things up.

America’s Tweethearts | vanityfair.com (via disoriented)

I just read this and I can’t help but feel how condescending the VF article was.  Sure the only person I know of in it is Felicia Day, but some things from the article made me wonder what the writer actually thought of the people they were calling tweethearts.

The writer referred to them constantly as ‘girls’, when they’re aged 26 to 30 and they work for a living.  How old are you, grandmother who penned the article? 36.

On Twitter, she wrote it “doesn’t even require real sentences, only a continual patter of excessively declarative and abbreviated palaver.”. While this is true, “doesn’t even” paints some definite bias towards how one should feel about the people she is writing about[1].  On the people she describes as tweethearts, “It so happens that they are nice girls—the Internet’s equivalent of a telephone chat line staffed by a bunch of cheerleaders”[2].  Is that all they are, ‘nice cheerleaders’?

What about talking about their achievements, or what actually makes these people popular or tweethearts other than their multitudes of followers? Popularity just doesn’t spring out of thin air.

The author writes, “the act of text-messaging the world [snip] is the essential feat of a twilebrity”. Well.. no. There are a couple factors that make a ‘twilebrity’.  Being able to text message isn’t actually one of them, it’s just a medium.  I mean check out @ActuallyNPH’s starting tweets.  They technically didn’t fit within the 140 character mark, but his ability to get his meaning and sense of humour across despite his truncated messages suggests some level of communicative skill, not simply an ability to text message.

Aside from prior celebrity, content is what keeps people coming back, not just the ability to jam 140 characters or less into some semblance of a message.  Not the “droppings” the writer mentions such as “getting highlights before class,” “I hrd u had fun!,” “Wah, missing my twittr time!”.  If that is all these people are tweeting, I’m not entirely sure how they managed to get and keep their several hundred thousand to 1.6 million followers.

I don’t care how much of a fan I am of their work, if that is all someone was tweeting… well, there’s only so much faecal tweet matter one can handle.  And most of us get more than enough spam a day without inflicting ourselves with more inane day-to-day messages from people we don’t know personally.

Or perhaps I missed that the point of the article was only about critiquing twitter as a new media source and its relation to real-time web (oh and how many articles have we seen about that already) rather than about the tweethearts the article title suggests it is about.


[1] And I am suddenly reminded of the way the outcast describes or perceives the in-crowd in those teen movies. Just as an aside.

[2] A bunch of pretty girls who call out short and witty messages with no real depth to improve morale.  Well that clears things up.

Loading...

Photo
fuckyeahmasioka:

asteroidfish:

3 people I love very much

OMG WHEN WAS THIS? and NATHAN FILLION/CAPTAIN HAMMER!!! *NERDGASMS*

Ooh, three of my favourite geeks ever.

fuckyeahmasioka:

asteroidfish:

3 people I love very much

OMG WHEN WAS THIS?
and NATHAN FILLION/CAPTAIN HAMMER!!! *NERDGASMS*

Ooh, three of my favourite geeks ever.

Loading...

Video

Behind the Scenes: When Galaxies Collide featuring Felicia Day (via SpitzerScienceCenter) (via FeliciaDay)

Loading...

Video

fuckyeahneilpatrickharris:

nathanmcquary:

Dr. Horrible at the Emmy’s

Watch it quickly, before it gets taken down.

Buffering ++

Yes, watch before the take down. Go go go!

Edit: Was taken down. Replaced with new link! Can’t stop the signal.

Loading...

Photo
(via motancharoen)
Dr Horrible won the category Emmy. :) Grats and well done to them all!
And Joss in sneakers. :P

(via motancharoen)

Dr Horrible won the category Emmy. :) Grats and well done to them all!

And Joss in sneakers. :P

Loading...

Link

theresalighton:

ecaloshay:

Disney have bought Marvel Comics for $4 billion in stock and cash. (via io9)

Not sure I like the sound of this.

Wonder if the next Wolverine movie will be a singalong? Hugh Jackman can hold a tune so it’s possible I suppose…

disoriented and I were just talking about if they remade Beauty and the Beast post merger. I suggested Hugh Jackman and Anna Paquin (given Rogue’s little crushing on Wolverine).  disoriented thought it was a bit jailbaitish. All we need is Joss Whedon in the mix and I think we have our next Dr. Horrible.

Actually, if Joss is involved, let’s replace Anna Paquin with Felicia Day.

Okay, I’m sold. Who’s up for a little movie-making by committee? Power of the internet, people. Let’s make it happen. ;)

Loading...

Photo
disoriented:

01-06 (via ecaloshay)
Check out the comments on this photo. Totally awesome. Thanks ecaloshay and Felicia Day!

It was a pleasure. :) I was just fortunate that Felicia Day and her friend(s) are so nice. :)
The tricky part was when I tweeted her a thank you and you IM’d me straight away asking me what I was thanking her for. I had to ignore you until today because I knew I wouldn’t be able to evade the question.

disoriented:

01-06 (via ecaloshay)

Check out the comments on this photo. Totally awesome. Thanks ecaloshay and Felicia Day!

It was a pleasure. :) I was just fortunate that Felicia Day and her friend(s) are so nice. :)

The tricky part was when I tweeted her a thank you and you IM’d me straight away asking me what I was thanking her for. I had to ignore you until today because I knew I wouldn’t be able to evade the question.

Loading...

Photo
(via egspoony) (via disoriented)
From Tycho:

I also saw Felicia Day at the show, who gave me a brush and told me to groom her. This is a thing that really happened, and it was bizarre, but not so bizarre that I wouldn’t do it. It was like brushing a unicorn.

From Felicia:

Tycho was especially nice and groomed me, something I’ve been waiting for since they posted this comic.   I’m not as frightened as I look.  It was an expert brushing.

(via egspoony) (via disoriented)

From Tycho:

I also saw Felicia Day at the show, who gave me a brush and told me to groom her. This is a thing that really happened, and it was bizarre, but not so bizarre that I wouldn’t do it. It was like brushing a unicorn.

From Felicia:

Tycho was especially nice and groomed me, something I’ve been waiting for since they posted this comic.   I’m not as frightened as I look.  It was an expert brushing.

Loading...

Link

The Guild music video is now #1 download in iTunes!  With special endorsement from Joss Whedon:

Okay, usually I stay above such matters. But this video must be number one!!! Who is this Taylor Swift? Some evil robot, PROBABLY. (Although an evil robot vid would also potentially be cool.) (But fine! She can be number two!) The point is, I love this video to distraction (and inevitable procrastination). It has Felicia — and money! Felicia LYING IN money! Combo-ed! Plus Vork, turkey legs, and the Solid Guild dancers! I care!

And I’m hobbled here, peeps. I don’t twitter (I occasionally Glitter and Be Gay, but that’s it), can’t digg, or favorite, or friend… In fact I don’t understand why my typewriter has a TV on it. I’M NOT SAVVY. But I really want this to be big. It’s indie (which is the most important part), it’s awesome, and it’s made by people that I friended in the old-fashioned way of being friends with them. (Okay, technically, I brothered Jed before I friended him, but he’s still super-talented.) So help me out. Let’s go the extra mile here and DESTROY THE SWIFTBOT! Then I can get back to the business of making Dollhouse stranger.

Digg deep, people.

Smoochez! -joss.

Loading...

Stuff I like